The Feisty Minority
Why Malays Mustn’t Cry Racism.
The topic of skin discrimination has reared its hideous face once again in Singapore. Like a whack-a-mole machine at the amusement arcade, talks of racism can never seem to disappear totally – even after 30 years of pounding away to achieve national harmony.
This time it started when I.T. firm Frontline Technologies took out job ads with a local recruitment website some weeks back. The ad came with a grotesque reminder that “non-Indians” are preferred for the post. The fiasco sparked off pockets of angry commentaries in the local press, some of which have spun off into even deeper accounts of racism experienced by other minorities. Inadvertently, some of these accounts have crept their way onto our local blogs and Internet forums.
But what amuses me is the fact that the one minority that seems to be more affected than the Indians themselves are the Malays. Not long after the spate of racist stories, several blogs and Internet forums are seen peppered with complaints and stories by our Malay workers about how they’ve been “shunned” by companies at job interviews, recruitment fairs and during their actual job itself. Many claim that they cannot advance further within their respective companies because of their “skin color”. On the ewadah.com forum, one particularly unhappy worker was lamenting the fact that it’s really pointless for Malays to upgrade themselves when companies only seem to promote “Mandarin-speaking” workers and that the nation itself is advocating speak Mandarin campaigns year after year.
If the Internet is a true measure of ground sentiments away from our sanitized press, then there is a whole bunch of unhappy Malay workers out there whose voices are yet to be heard. And most of these voices are crying “racism”.
My word to fellow Malays of the country is to stop whining about racial discrimination – even if it really does exist. Accusations of racism are not only dangerous in the context of a multi-racial society like ours, but more importantly it’s frivolous. In fact, I’m beginning to think it’s rather wimpy.
The fact of the matter is this - over the course of mankind’s existence, there has always been groups of people faced with some form of discrimination or the other. It’s something that no civilization can ever escape from. Not even we, whose existence have been bolstered by the utopian dreams of a multi-racial society that is Singapore. No point denying that shimmers of these discriminations may just exist in this peaceful island we call home.
But what is more important to note is that oppressed minority groups over the course of history have done either one of two things when they are faced with racism. They either whine, or they shine. To which group do we Malays want to align ourselves to?
Good examples of a minority group that shine instead of whine are the Jews all over the world. From the Ottoman Turks in Arabia to Nazi Germany who ruled much of Europe in the 1940s, Jews are minorities who have faced every possible form of discrimination known to mankind – some even became the cause of their deaths. Till today, wisps of hatred still exist towards the Jewish race, even in a “democratic” country like the United States. As actor Mel Gibson demonstrated very well not so long ago albeit a drunken stupor, Jews in the country are still dogmatized with ancient prejudices.
But instead of whining about it and demanding that they be treated fairly like the Caucasians, they chose to show the world how a minority race can shine. And shining they are indeed. Consider this: Jews make up only 2% of the population in the USA but they are the wealthiest ethnic race by far and control much the economy. Steven Spielberg, Ralph Lauren, Michael Dell are just some of the more contemporary Jewish figures who have a made a name for themselves in the American economy – instead of making excuses.
Meanwhile, in the list of American Nobel prize winners, 40% of the laureates are Jewish. Academically they also make up 30% of the population in America’s elite universities – by far a very disproportionate representation. (All statistics from The Jewish Phenomenon, a book by Steven Silbiger)
Many more statistical data exist that will demonstrate very well how a tiny minority has rose to the occasion and exerted so much influence in the world’s largest economy. But one does not have to peer very far for another example of a minority that shines instead of whines. Just look across the causeway.
It is a well known fact the Chinese population in Malaysia does not receive the same types of privileges that ethnic Malays do. From university scholarships to educational grants, the Chinese population has been systematically marginalized since time can remember. Quite a while ago, there was a newspaper report about how a Chinese student scored straight ‘A’s for his STPM examinations but could still not secure a place in a local university due to the ethnic quotas imposed by the institution.
Similar discrimination exists on the economic front too. Non-Malay businessmen are not allowed to tender for government contracts and Chinese businesses are usually hard pressed for government assistance who understandably prefer to only help their “own kind”.
But do we see them complaining? They most definitely do not. Instead they put the majority race there into an existence of shame. Despite the blatant racism, the Chinese have risen to become an economic and business powerhouse in the land. In Forbes Malaysia’s list of 10 richest people, 8 of them are Chinese. These include hotel moguls, estate developers and bankers who have made it to where they are without the favorable conditions that the Malays there enjoy. This tremendous creation of wealth has inadvertently elevated the socio-economic status of the Chinese community in Malaysia-in sharp contrast to that of the Malays who continue live in perpetual mediocrity. Will the Malays there ever wake up?
When Singapore Malays complain about racism, they are no different from their brethrens up north who keep blaming their surroundings for the state they are in. Singapore as a society has worked very hard to eradicate racism. Our society is a plural one that rewards and recognizes solely based on meritocracy. Whether you sink or swim is really up to your efforts, instead of the ethnic group that you belong in. You have to admit it that the conditions our minorities face here a just so much better than what the Jews or Malaysian Chinese faced when they were just starting out.
If however you are in the unlikely situation of finding yourself working in a racist company that has yet to be enlightened by our national policies, just remember one important point : Racism, like any other obstacle in life, can either work against you or in your favor. What does not kill you will make you stronger. The Jews and the Malaysian Chinese have recognized these very well and have worked it towards their advantage by shining instead of whining. Will Singapore Malays do the same?

29 Comments:
Great essay;
cheers.
I enjoy reading your writings. =)
What if I told you I had a Malay boss who always favour Malays when it comes to recommending bonuses, promotions and availability of resources to do our jobs? Isn't that discrimination and racism too? It is a fallacy to think the minority is always discriminated against because of color.
Dear Ridzwan,
A very well-written and thoughtful article.
I have been following some of your articles, and will like to engage in private conversation with you over email on some matters.
Can you email me at this address: bleongcw( at )gmail.com?
Hope that all are well.
Take care & best regards,
Bernard Leong
I disagree with classifying those who complain about discrimination and racial injustice in our society as "whiners". There are legitimate and horrible cases of racism in Singapore, and it is important for these cases to be highlighted. It is true that throughout history, certain groups have been discriminated against. This, however, is no excuse for this behaviour today. A hundred years ago the same argument could have been applied to slavery: There have always been slaves in history, so there's no reason to whine about it now.
Just because racism is worse in some surrounding countries does not excuse racism in Singapore. Are you saying that because they discriminate against the Chinese in Malaysia, that gives Singaporean Chinese the right to discriminate against Malays here? You also advocate using racism to ones' own advantage. How?
The only reason that racism has been largely eliminated in modern societies is because of brave "whiners" who highlight social injustices. I think it is awful that so many businesses in Singapore advertise jobs only for "Mandarin-speaking" individuals. This is not fair, and I will continue to "whine" about it until this insidious practice stops. Eliminating racial discrimination is not only about eliminating feelings of racism and whining, but is about constructing a fair legal framework that ensures equal treatment in hiring, housing, business, government, and education. This legal framework is largely lacking in Singapore, and in its place is a system that prohibits racial hate speech and words that injure racial feelings. I believe the former is much more important than the latter. Let's not forget that although the Jews in America are sometimes subjected to hate speech and racial slurs, they are also subjected to a fair system that ensures their equality under the law, in housing, business, education, and hiring. But in Singapore, a fair system does not exist. Your analogy between Jews in America and Malays in Singapore is seriously flawed for this reason.
Therefore, I respectfully and strongly disagree with what you have written.
To teck soon
The writer cited the Malaysian Chinese example is simply to highlight that in spite of blatant 'legalised' racism towards them (university quotas, business deals etc), the Chinese continue to I quote 'Shine' in every aspect most notably in business where they control a disproportionate stake in the Malaysian economy. In no way did the writer state that it's OK for the Malays to be subjected to racism in Singapore since the Chinese in Malaysia are treated the exact same way. Read his article again and you'll see that what he espouses is for the Singaporean Malay to strive hard like the Malaysian Chinese instead of wallowing in self pity of the circumstances around him.
You wrote 'a fair legal framework that ensures equal treatment in hiring, housing, business, government, and education. This legal framework is largely lacking in Singapore'
May I ask if you can justify what you have just said? As far as I know, the aspects you have written has equal opportunity for every Singaporean regardless of race. If you want to quote to me that certain businesses prefers 'Mandarin speakers', it is to me NOT a form of racism but a practicality on the firm's part, since the company might be catering to a chinese crowd and not knowing Mandarin translates to a loss in say, sales from a Mandarin only speaker. If however a Malay or Indian can speak absolutely fluent Mandarin and its dialect, I dont see why companies would shun from hiring them. Under this context, can I also cry gender discrimination whenver i see 'Female working Environment' since I'm a guy?
For the rest like housing and education, please justify in what way are the other races disadvantaged? Housing at racial specific districts like Chinatown or Haig Road has quotas in place to ensure that the area has a good mix of the different races. Or do you mean to perhaps say that Malays or Indians buy property at a higher price than the Chinese? The same goes for Education. Can I infer that a Malay is required to score higher than a Chinese to get an A? Or do you mean scholarships are given to the Chinese instead of the Malay ceteris paribus?
Kindly justify what you have said.
Chanced upon this featured write-up at Tomorrow.
Well-written piece you have there.
I think there will always be discrimination against a particular group, but what makes a difference is how the authority acts on it.
If someone's really bent on being successful, no amount of discrimination against that person will ever stop him/her from achieving that dream.
Life's not fair, after all.
I am not a Malay but I am apalled at the way our fellow citizens are treated.
One day, I hope that there will come a time when every Singapore child can go to a Special Assistance Plan school with extra government funding, when every young man with talent and ability can become a pilot or work in the support arms or win a scholarship based on his leadership skills, when every qualified individual can win a job based on his skills regardless of his language ability, when the most qualified individual can become prime minister of Singapore regardless of his race, when every language is given the support for its promotion in all areas, then we might have gotten closer as a nation...
'Mandarin-speaking only' is code for 'Chinese only', to avoid looking too partial. There have been instances where a non-Chinese who is fluent in Mandarin was turned down for the job even though it clearly asked for 'Mandarin speaking'.
Anyways, I think being denied a job because of your race is less offensive than being rejected because you wear a hijab. I had an almost-employer ask me to remove the hijab because it "doesn't look modern" (it was a florist job). I don't see how my hijab affects my job performance. Are people less inclined to buy flowers from a tudung wearing makcik?
Hey, your reasoning's pretty silly. Just because racism happens doesn't mean that people should tolerate it.
Besides, it's possible for a community to work hard *and* fight for less discrimination at the same time. They're not mutually exclusive goals.
Great write and very balance views.
Business have no colour or race. If the business dealing is majority China, then "speak mandarin" is a requirement. When middle east business open up, then speak arabic is neccessary.
Re: Florists - what if they are?
And if someone with a tattoo or piercing is looked upon less favorably for jobs...
Discrimination isn't right, but people tend to be blind to most sorts of it, and just have eyes for racial and gender discrimination.
I must be living on another planet. Not withstanding what you have written, I know personally some very high flying individuals in Frontline Technologies. Guess what? They're Indians.
I would be hard pressed to ever conclude that Frontlien Technologies is racist. It is very likely they needed non-Indians because of functional reasons. Maybe they needed staff who are ethnic Chinese or Malay for their China and Indonesian businesses?
Boy, I hope you never become a counselor anywhere. On freakin' Martin Luther King Day, no less.
"I'm a woman, and I keep getting passed over for promotion in favour of men who are far less talented and capable than I am!"
"Suck it up."
Your Jewish comparison is faulty. A better analogy would be, say, African Americans. And there's definitely a racist undercurrent in America in that area.
Simply put: telling people to ignore legitimate claims of racism and bias is incredibly stupid. Sweeping the problem under the carpet doesn't make a genuine problem go away. Ask the late Martin Luther King.
For you to advocate such a boneheaded and callous stance is, frankly, appalling.
Glad that u are able to be that open about racism :) Shine instead of whine, totally agree ;) Singaporeans just can't stop whining and complaining :P
I introduced your blog to my Canadian buddy from the university, Mr. James Dunlap. He is now practising law in Hong Kong. Thought you might like to read his, as usual, profound response.
"Yes, this is a very interesting blog. This guy is a real breath of fresh air. What he says is to me just common sense, but that seems to be in shorter and shorter supply, at least in Western society, with pc-dom carrying everything before it and whining about how hard done by one is becoming not only a right but a sacred duty -- and these for people who are among the most pamepered and spoiled on the planet.
I especially liked the first one, which reflects my sentiments exactly.
As usual, I got side-tracked by a particular aspect that interested me: he did exaggerate a bit on how wealthy and influential the Jews in the U.S. are. He says his stats are from The Jewish Phenomenon, by Steven Silbiger, but assuming that book was accurate (I don't know it at all) he misunderstood / mis-summarized some points. Of course he meant it all positively, but this sort of exaggeration often plays to anti-Semitism, so I'm sensitive to it. And I just like accuracy. His mistakes:
"Jews make up only 2% of the population in the USA but they are the wealthiest ethnic race by far and control much the economy."
In fact the Chinese Americans were, even years ago, about on a par with the Jews in terms of average income. The Scottish Americans (just to take a random example) and many other hardworking, thrifty ethnic groups do similarly well.
According to the 2000 census http://www.engagingamerica.org/ajc/ethnpartner/index.asp?partnerID=8&subHeadID=11 and http://regentsprep.org/Regents/ushisgov/themes/geography/humangeography.cfm
Asian Americans were 4.2% of the US population (including mixed race; 3.6% "only Asian").
"Pacific Islanders" (not included in "Asians") were another 0.3%, so "Asian / Pacific Islander" would be 4.5% in 2000, a bit higher now.
The median income of Asian families was $59,000 (cf $50,000 for all families -- 18% higher)
In 1999, among year-round, full-time workers, the median earnings of Asian men were 9 percent higher than those of all men
The median earnings of Asian women were 14% higher than those of all women
In 2003, according to the Census Bureau http://www.census.gov/Press-Release/www/releases/archives/income_wealth/002484.html:
Real median household income [i.e. in inflation-adjusted; doesn't give base year]: $43,318
non-Hispanic white households: about $48,000
Asian households: about $55,500 [28% above all Americans]
And this even though 69% of Asians were foreign born, 34% non-citizens, 17% SE Asian (10% Vietnamese, 7% other) -- see first site above.
Jews: Washington Times, Wednesday, October 09, 2002, A3, "Jewish Population in U.S. Declining", By Rachal Zoll, Associated Press
"The median household income for Jews is about $50,000, compared with $42,000 for all U.S."
That's 19% above all U.S. So assuming there was no change between 2002 and 2003, Asian households are now 8% above the Jews. And that's ALL Asians -- including large numbers of poor, recently arrived immigrants, whereas the Jews are overwhelming an old, established community. So much for the Jews being "wealthiest by far".
And don't forget us Scottish either!
Asian American individual and per capita income are a bit less outstanding, because Asian American households are bigger and have more wage-earners. But these factors are less true of Chinese Americans.
Most of the rest what he said about the American Jews was true.
"in the list of American Nobel prize winners, 40% of the laureates are Jewish." This is about right. Wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jewish_American says 37%. The Chinese Americans, according to Wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_American make up 1.2% of the US population (cf 2% for the Jews), and had 5 Nobel Laureates, or 3.1% of the 160 American laureates (out of 758 individuals altogether). http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nobel_laureates_by_country That's very good, but the Jews are an order of magnitude better.
"Academically they also make up 30% of the population in America’s elite universities – by far a very disproportionate representation."
I'm not sure but I think that's about right, maybe a bit too high. A very pc Nov 11, 2006 article in the Harvard Crimson (student daily) http://www.thecrimson.com/article.aspx?ref=515908 says "Asian-Americans make up about 4.5 percent of the nation’s population, but only 10 percent to 30 percent of students at elite U.S. universities." Why "only"?!? I suppose anything less than 30-50% is an insult to Asians. Anyhow, if the Asians are 20%, Jews are 30% and affirmative-actioned groups (blacks, Hispanics, North American Indians) are 10%, that leaves "only" (or is it "an outrageously high") 40% for non-Jewish non-Hispanic white Americans (who make up about 2/3 of the population).
At Berkeley law school when I was there Jewish students were substantially less than 30%, in the same order of magnitude. They were much less at UC Berkeley generally, where Asian Americans, mostly Chinese, become the majority on campus generally around 1990 shortly after I left. A more recent statistic from Wikipedia says 43% of undergrads in 2003. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Model_minority (I think its higher for the whole university, including grad students.)
The Jews were actually subject to quotas at top US universities until the 1950s, and discrimination against them for top jobs in academia and the professional world continued into the 1960s. I remember reading an article by Alan Dershowovitz (a top US litigator and professor at Harvard) about his life. He graduated with high marks from Harvard, but couldn't get offers at most of the top US law firms. So Jews founded their own top New York law firm, Paul Weiss, and hired droves of these top Jewish lawyers who the others wouldn't hire. Now of course things have changed, and so has Paul Weiss -- lots of non-Jews there now. But still have a few more Jews than in the population of New York City.
One area where Jewish Americans are miles ohead of Chinese Americans is politics. There are now (2007) 13 Jewish American Senators and 30 Congressmen. I'm not sure how many Chinese Americans there are -- I can't think of any Senators. There may be a Congressmen or two. Gary Locke was Governor of Washington. But there aren't many. The reasons are partly that the Chinese Americans are on the average more recently arrived, traditional Chinese negative, passive attitudes towards politics and (a bit) their smaller numbers, but that's not a major factor.
OK, time to get back to work.
James Dunlap
Lovells Hong Kong (2840 5003)
-----Original Message-----
From: Choo Choo Kam [mailto:kambobo777@yahoo.com]
Sent: 16 January 2007 21:42
To: jyang@att.com; richtam@sbcglobal.net; Dunlap, James; yekker@gmail.com; jerlynn@gmail.com
Subject: Introducing you and interesting and profound Malay blogger
With all due respect to the writer, Muhammad Ridzwan of www.ridzwan.com, but his arguments tantamount to Malays, and other Muslims, meekly accepting and tolerating racism and are therefore callous, irrational and unintelligent.
The Jews, unknown to the writer, did not achieve what they have achieved by tolerating racism. They fought against it and they fought it hard. Apparently the writer is not aware that criticisms of Israel, a Jewish individual or a Jewish organisation are virtually forbidden, least one is accused of anti-Semitism even though the criticisms are valid.
No community of people should tolerate racism because racism is a barrier to plenty of positive things. Merely having the need, the desire and the want to succeed is not enough if the paths towards achieving that success is blocked.
For example, the only way for the Untouchable Hindus of India to gain access to university education and to government jobs are through acts of law - a prime example that merely having the desire and striving to materialise that desire are not enough. And even the Chinese in Malaysia strives against what they perceived as racist policies.
Again with due respect to the writer, he is apparently uneducated in the way the world works. His opinions, if taken to heart, would only result in complacency on the part of the Malays and therefore are detrimental to the community. His opinions legitimize racism - the Malays should not therefore accept them; for certainly if his opinions are addressed to the Jews and Chinese, they would not be accepted.
Faris Abdat
frovpt@singnet.com.sg
Wow! This is really well written! I'll let some of my friends read it too..
Cheers!
To Yuchiro,
We will have difficulty of agreeing because of the lack of reliable statistics: It is my belief that the reason many businesses advertise for "Mandarin speakers" is that they do not want to hire non-Chinese (a racist reason, not a business reason). You disagree, suggesting that they want to increase sales by catering to Chinese customers. Fair enough. What we really need are public surveys of racial attitudes to pin down the real cause. In the US, for example, this "business need" for certain language speakers would have to be legally demonstrated. This is not the case in Singapore, and racists here are able to easily hide behind the business excuse. For example, I have seen simple cashiering jobs advertised for "Mandarin/English speakers only". Simple cashiering in Singapore does not require Mandarin, since it involves very little interaction with a customer. Rather this should be legal or not, I lean towards "no". But at the very least I do expect fellow Chinese to recognise this when it occurs and ask yourselves, "do they REALLY need a Mandarin speaker, or are they just against hiring non-Chinese?" And don't dismiss how these hiring practises affect feelings of other races towards the majority, regardless of the reason (even if a legitimate business reason).
As far as the housing policy goes, my opinion is that it serves primarily to dilute the voting rights of minorities by spreading them out in the country, to be replaced by PAP hand-picked minority candidates in GRCs. Minorities will be less likely to protest, to organise, if they are spread out.
You asked me for justifications for my arguments. Statistics about racial feelings are not available in Singapore, due to the harsh climate of free speech here. So I have little justification. I also wish that we lived in a freely open intellectual society where racial feelings could be openly surveyed, studied, and discussed in the hope of building a more understanding and tolerant society in the future.
But no studies, please, we're Singaporeans.
Your simplification is embarrassing. The assumption is that a person discriminated against has the potential to outshine.
To Teck Soon
When I seek justifications, I am referring to factual evidences such as policies, law etc that support your statements.
Clearly, the call for 'Mandarin Speakers' in job advertisements is largely subjective, and to a certain extent I cannot deny the possibility that one might prefer a Chinese for the job instead. You can't however immediately slam this as evidence of racism because of the practicality issue I've mentioned. If on the other hand the ad states 'Chinese preferred', then you have a valid case to argue.
You mentioned 'diluting the voting rights of minorities' so they 'will be less likely to protest...if they are spread out'.
In what way may I ask if this pertains to any discussion of racism? If a certain political party exercises divide and control to remain in power, I do not see how it relates to racism? Racism refers to the oppression and discrimination of a particular race and if the party spreads them out, is this considered Racism? Are they being discriminated and oppressed because of who they are? And I repeat once again, the quotas for housing ensures a fair mix of races and your argument of being spread out does not apply exclusively to minorities as well. This voting rights argument you have ventured is simply political. Period.
I dont need statistics. I just require you to show valid evidences of how minority groups are disadvantaged in terms of education, business deals etc, which is according to what you have stated.
PS. interesting argument you guys are having. But no matter what you do, always remember that we all a have right to our own opinions. SHARE IT! but do not try to shove it down each others' throat. We are all the same.
The arguments for and against his author's post have been invigorating and highly stimulating. In short, its great. I love a good and intelligent debate (Without the name calling though).
I think to really go into an academic treatise on racism would require far more than a simple blog entry. There have been countless books, articles, speeches and acts of violence in the name of anti or even pro racism. To find the facts and various perspectives, one would simply need to google it. So here, I do think that the author is simply presenting a point of view and perhaps a stance he has taken, being malay himself.
In which case, I do not think he is endorsing racism in Singapore or even saying it should be tolerated. He is simple taking the moderate viewpoint that whether racism happens or not, a minority should work through it and excel despite the presence of if. I think he is trying to celebrate the human spirit than to condone a human evil.
More importantly, he is taking a personal stand that he has chosen and its good enough for him. I think it might be a tad presumptious to speak for an entire race, but I do respect his viewpoint for himself.
Dear all,
I have been looking for a job for 3 weeks now.I am at a breaking point and I feel extremely demoralized.I will be starting my Diploma this March but it seems to be more of a hindrance.Employers seem to be worried that the timing might clash and so on..As I am married, they worry that I might decide to start having children.Its always the same questions.My reassurance that my studies will not affect my work and I do not wish for kids for years to come does not help.The government encourages education and more children but everything seems to be the opposite.Oh Lord give me strength to go through this hard times.Lessen the burden me.For you are most kind.
Hi.
I have to say I disagree with your point-of-view. Sure, the oppressed minority may shine, but how are they supposed to do so when they are not even given the equal opportunity to attempt? Are you implying that they should simply keep quiet? Singapore would then be a living contradiction.
Besides, Singapore's Constitution Article 12 states that 'there shall be no discrimination...on the ground only of religion, race, descent or place of birth in any law...or employment." If one is expected not even to fight for one's rights, to 'live with it', the equal protection law has just lost its purpose. I'm sure if you're in their shoes, you would be singing a totally different tune.
To conclude that one either 'whines or shines' is also fallacious! (Hasty generalisation) You have picked out the best of the examples, but what about the rest of the people? Some may have the talent inherent in them, others depend on diligence. But if in the first case, they are discriminated against already, even if they are diligent, they would be denied the opportunity to soar in their respective careers or pathways.
Racism exist and its true but rather than whine and complain ,why not try and adapt...
I myself manage to make myself a more valuable Malay by learning the Mandarin language so that there is no excuse for employers that i cant communicate in their language...
If we continue lamenting of our poor fate then when are we going to rise as a community or socity right...
Of course there are legitimate claims from people who are being discriminated against even with multiple langauge abilities... Then again you need to be able to prove that you are worthy of the position...
Also the need to understand certain racism issues...
Like for example what i understand from those employers who dont want indian employees is due to the ceratin "stench" and also due to the very fact indians have the ability to twist and turn words in a bad way.... Not being racist but this is true...there are of cos the better indians who are not like that.... but would also depend on the industry of the job u apply for... In a certain workplace such "talents" showcased by the indians are very valuable...
no offense to anyone aite...
Hi Ridzwan,
If only say, 20% of the Malay population in Malaysia have reached such consciousness like yourself, a fellow Malay, I will shed tears of happiness.
And thanks for sharing your people's plight not in a defensive, complaining manner, but by objective self observation, looking at your challenges from a brightly positive and encouragingly proactive viewpoint. For all that your have said, is rather independent (as in standing on your own two feet's independence) and courageous.
I am from Malaysia and have yet to hear of any Malaysian politician, who has had the guts to look at their challenges the way you do and to stand up for the injustices other groups face with empathy and equality as your light.
It now dawns on me that, through the hardships that Singaporean Malays face living in a majority Singaporean Chinese society, and vice versa, Chinese Malaysians living in a majority Malay society, it provides an interestingly ironic mirror for both countries, and both races, to look at each other, through shared grievances, opportunities to reach out to one another, as minorities, and to build better understanding and meaningful friendships, in the quest to overcome majority prejudices, through the creation of new interactions, from informal forums, discussions, blogs, to higher formal institutional gatherings. And of course this is for all minority races, Indians, and other indegeneous groups. (My comments mainly on Malay and Chinese is just to highlight the ironic scenario between Malay and Chinese racial 'positions' in both countries)
Keep standing tall my much respected Malay friend! And all of us continue evolving our mindsets and actions in becoming enlightened beings, filled with only the highest good toward the human race.
To anil: I'm equally embarassed by your groundless and shallow embarassment.
Yes, throughout history, those who are discriminated against, pressured and ostracized are more often than not keener in their sensitivities toward their surroundings and life; they can't afford to be laid-back and 'relax' as our many Malays here have shown.
It is universally well-known that those who are suffer have the greatest right to fight for their individual happiness. Because it was robbed from them, they would want to take it. That spurs them tow work harder, fight stronger and rise above the rest.
Therefore we have the African Amercians, Chinese, and the Jews.
To all disagree-ers: truth is always simple yet profound. Depending one which side you take, you may land up snigerring it as 'simple-minded', 'childish' or 'shallow'.
Truth is: Ridz has told us about the facts of life - if you have tripped and fell, there are ONLY two choices in front of you. Either you sit (or lie) down there and cry and WHINE, or you get up on your own. Of course, if someone wishes to adopt the 'cluth-mentality' as his principle in life, he can well wait for someone to offer him one (cluth). Other than that, you really can't do any other stunt.
Singapore Malays are as such. I do not agree that ALL Malays whine and grind. But is there not voices we heard, angry messages we read (behind public toilets' doors) and muttered complaints we (over)heard? So as a Malay himself, he is telling his own community: look, there are just so many things you all can do - either whine or shine. Which path you take ultimately decides your future and life. Period. Whether the Government changes, the laws revised, the populations inter-swapped, they are all not within his argument, and control.
It's a very, very simple yet straight-forward telling about one basic fact of life. So stop whining and get on with your life.
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home